<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Victorian / Tasmanian land border</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.expeditionoz.com/blog/2008/09/23/victorian-tasmanian-land-border/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.expeditionoz.com/blog/2008/09/23/victorian-tasmanian-land-border</link>
	<description>Where the Journey is more important than the destination...usually.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 08:18:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.expeditionoz.com/blog/2008/09/23/victorian-tasmanian-land-border/comment-page-1#comment-1295</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 08:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.expeditionoz.com/blog/?p=207#comment-1295</guid>
		<description>http://www.ga.gov.au/education/geoscience-basics/dimensions/state-territory-borders.html

Aletheia, 
Please have a look at the above link under the title Shortest Border for more information from a reliable source.
Lyn,
When being petty and correcting others make sure that you are also correct. The border is an Australian one and under Australian law Government makes all measurement in SI units (i.e. metric). A metre is a unit of length, a meter is something with which one measures. In the above response there are twelve deliberate errors; please email me when you have found them all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ga.gov.au/education/geoscience-basics/dimensions/state-territory-borders.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ga.gov.au/education/geoscience-basics/dimensions/state-territory-borders.html</a></p>
<p>Aletheia,<br />
Please have a look at the above link under the title Shortest Border for more information from a reliable source.<br />
Lyn,<br />
When being petty and correcting others make sure that you are also correct. The border is an Australian one and under Australian law Government makes all measurement in SI units (i.e. metric). A metre is a unit of length, a meter is something with which one measures. In the above response there are twelve deliberate errors; please email me when you have found them all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyn Truss</title>
		<link>http://www.expeditionoz.com/blog/2008/09/23/victorian-tasmanian-land-border/comment-page-1#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyn Truss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.expeditionoz.com/blog/?p=207#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Dear Aletheia

Here is your contribution with appropriate punctuation. I hope this helps, do please try to write properly. Thank you.

&quot;Well, I am not convinced, because the Victorian Land Administration, at least, is still officially confused about this supposed border: see page 22 of
http://www.sli.unimelb.edu.au/subjects/451/418/418_2008/Lectures/Lecture%2024-%20JT%20%20Land%20Admin&amp;%20LS%20-May2008.pdf

However, if the border really has been marked, then some public documentation must exist in addition to the marker or markers, in which case
the date &amp; survey technology &amp; geodetic data that were used for determining the location of the supposedly proclaimed boundary latitude would be of some interest too. Otherwise I think it is just that the islet is said to be roughly 85 meters wide
&amp; this is not necessarily the same thing as actually having an 85 meter border upon it. So please let me know if you should learn anything more definitive.
&amp; thanx again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Aletheia</p>
<p>Here is your contribution with appropriate punctuation. I hope this helps, do please try to write properly. Thank you.</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, I am not convinced, because the Victorian Land Administration, at least, is still officially confused about this supposed border: see page 22 of<br />
<a href="http://www.sli.unimelb.edu.au/subjects/451/418/418_2008/Lectures/Lecture%2024-%20JT%20%20Land%20Admin&#038;%20LS%20-May2008.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.sli.unimelb.edu.au/subjects/451/418/418_2008/Lectures/Lecture%2024-%20JT%20%20Land%20Admin&#038;%20LS%20-May2008.pdf</a></p>
<p>However, if the border really has been marked, then some public documentation must exist in addition to the marker or markers, in which case<br />
the date &amp; survey technology &amp; geodetic data that were used for determining the location of the supposedly proclaimed boundary latitude would be of some interest too. Otherwise I think it is just that the islet is said to be roughly 85 meters wide<br />
&amp; this is not necessarily the same thing as actually having an 85 meter border upon it. So please let me know if you should learn anything more definitive.<br />
&amp; thanx again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aletheia kallos</title>
		<link>http://www.expeditionoz.com/blog/2008/09/23/victorian-tasmanian-land-border/comment-page-1#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>aletheia kallos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 22:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.expeditionoz.com/blog/?p=207#comment-78</guid>
		<description>well i am not convinced because the victorian land administration at least is still officially confused about this supposed border 
per page 22 of 
http://www.sli.unimelb.edu.au/subjects/451/418/418_2008/Lectures/Lecture%2024-%20JT%20%20Land%20Admin&amp;%20LS%20-May2008.pdf
but if the border really has been marked then some public documentation must exist in addition to the marker or markers
&amp; in that case the date &amp; survey technology &amp; geodetic datum that were used for determining the location of the supposedly proclaimed boundary latitude would be of some interest too
because otherwise i think it is just that the islet is said to be roughly 85 meters wide
&amp; this is not necessarily the same thing as actually having an 85 meter border upon it
so please let me know if you should learn anything more definitive
&amp; thanx again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well i am not convinced because the victorian land administration at least is still officially confused about this supposed border<br />
per page 22 of<br />
<a href="http://www.sli.unimelb.edu.au/subjects/451/418/418_2008/Lectures/Lecture%2024-%20JT%20%20Land%20Admin&#038;%20LS%20-May2008.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.sli.unimelb.edu.au/subjects/451/418/418_2008/Lectures/Lecture%2024-%20JT%20%20Land%20Admin&#038;%20LS%20-May2008.pdf</a><br />
but if the border really has been marked then some public documentation must exist in addition to the marker or markers<br />
&amp; in that case the date &amp; survey technology &amp; geodetic datum that were used for determining the location of the supposedly proclaimed boundary latitude would be of some interest too<br />
because otherwise i think it is just that the islet is said to be roughly 85 meters wide<br />
&amp; this is not necessarily the same thing as actually having an 85 meter border upon it<br />
so please let me know if you should learn anything more definitive<br />
&amp; thanx again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick</title>
		<link>http://www.expeditionoz.com/blog/2008/09/23/victorian-tasmanian-land-border/comment-page-1#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.expeditionoz.com/blog/?p=207#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Hi aletheia,

I&#039;m sure at some point that either GeoScience Australia (or the agency that looked after this stuff before them) went out and measured the island when the realised that the border ran through it.

The only photo i could dig up was the one from the article in The Age, and all of the online mapping services don&#039;t provide a close enough image to see what is actually on the tiny rocky outcrop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi aletheia,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure at some point that either GeoScience Australia (or the agency that looked after this stuff before them) went out and measured the island when the realised that the border ran through it.</p>
<p>The only photo i could dig up was the one from the article in The Age, and all of the online mapping services don&#8217;t provide a close enough image to see what is actually on the tiny rocky outcrop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aletheia kallos</title>
		<link>http://www.expeditionoz.com/blog/2008/09/23/victorian-tasmanian-land-border/comment-page-1#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>aletheia kallos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.expeditionoz.com/blog/?p=207#comment-76</guid>
		<description>hi
i am curious if anyone knows whether the boundary has been marked
or how the 85 meter distance was arrived at
thanx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi<br />
i am curious if anyone knows whether the boundary has been marked<br />
or how the 85 meter distance was arrived at<br />
thanx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

